KNOWLEDGE AND THE KNOWER—
WHAT COUNTS AS KNOWLEDGE?

PARABLE OF THE BLIND MEN AND THE ELEPHANT

Multiple blind men ineptly perusing a huge elephant. Digital image generated in May 2023 by TOK teacher, Andrew Brown using DALL·E at the OpenAI site.

CLASS ACTIVITY i
Ready… FIRE, AIM! — REVISITED

Start by reminding students about the very first activity performed in our TOK class—Explore mystery objects by touch alone. Recall that we attempted to identify a plastic Octopus, a Möbius strip made with modeling clay, and a fossilized knuckle bone of extinct Patagonia horse with varying degrees of success.

Today’s ice-breaking activity echoes that first session. Ask students to come to the front of the class, one-by-one, in silence, to identify, by touch alone, a mechanical part that has been hidden in a pillow case.

Front brake disc from a 1994 BMW K75 motorcycle and pillow case, photographed in the author’s kitchen

The teacher should bring in any object that is part of a larger whole. I found a brake disc from a 1994 BMW K75 motorcycle conveniently to hand. But you could choose any object. A bicycle chain, a microscope objective, or even a chess piece are familiar objects that come to mind.

Without revealing the object or allowing any further comment whatsoever, move on swiftly to the next activity.

CLASS ACTIVITY I - THE POEM

Select nine willing students for a dramatic but light-hearted reading of the John Godfrey Saxe poem. The class will no doubt recognize the Blind Men and the Elephant story from childhood picture books.

The Blind Men and the Elephant

I
It was six men of Indostan
To learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant
(Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation
Might satisfy his mind.

II.
The First approached the Elephant,
And happening to fall
Against his broad and sturdy side,
At once began to bawl:
"God bless me!—but the Elephant
Is very like a wall!"

III.
The Second, feeling of the tusk,
Cried: "Ho!—what have we here
So very round and smooth and sharp?
To me 't is mighty clear
This wonder of an Elephant
Is very like a spear!"

IV.
The Third approached the animal,
And happening to take
The squirming trunk within his hands,
Thus boldly up and spake:
"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant
Is very like a snake!"

V.
The Fourth reached out his eager hand,
And felt about the knee.
"What most this wondrous beast is like
Is mighty plain," quoth he;
"'T is clear enough the Elephant
Is very like a tree!"

VI.
The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,
Said: "E'en the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most;
Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant
Is very like a fan!"

VII.
The Sixth no sooner had begun
About the beast to grope,
Than, seizing on the swinging tail
That fell within his scope,
"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant
Is very like a rope!"

VIII.
And so these men of Indostan
Disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion
Exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!

MORAL.
So, oft in theologic wars
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen!

John Godfrey Saxe (1872) 

Hanabusa Itchō (1652–1724) Blind monks examining an elephant, Ukiyo-e woodcut print.

Pachydermal caricature

Next, to capture the spirit of the poem, ask the class to sketch a cartoon of an elephant with a wall, a spear, a snake, a fan, a tree, and a rope in place of their respective anatomical features.

Elephant eye. Photo Credit: Jiri Foltyn / Shutterstock

CLASS DISCUSSION—WARM-Up QUESTIONS

  • Elephant societies are matriarchal because all the males leave the herd when they become sexually mature. Elephants have a 22 month gestation period. Elephant calves require constant maternal care for at least six months. Elephants have 2 nipples. Elephants communicate subsonically across many kilometers. Can you suggest an additional fun fact about elephants not perceived by the blind men?

  • Differentiate between Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus?

  • What was in the pillow case?

GOING DEEPER—Tougher questions

After adding a fun twist by showing the short video, delve deeper with the following questions:

  • What insights into knowledge acquisition can be made from the Parable of the Blind Men and the Elephant?

  • Does it matter if our acquisition of knowledge happens in “bubbles” where some information and voices are excluded?

  • What parallels can be made with regard to the human condition when comparing the Blind Men and the Elephant, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, and The Truman Show (2008)?

  • Differentiate between reductionism and holism?

Three intriguing links

Content from the following three links might add value if class discussion moves spontaneously in the direction of personhood and ethics.

CLASS ACTIVITY II - HOLISM VS. REDUCTIONISM

Provide pairs of students with a printed strip containing the following:

The total magnitude of the spin signal, obtained by integrating the spectrum in Fig. 4a, was found to be { [ Δf 1 (t)] 2} = 28mHz 2. Using this experimental value and the relationship { [ Δf 1 (t)] 2} = ( 4/ π) 2 { δ f c} 2 [ {A(t)} 2], we solve for { δ f c} using the assumption that [ {A(t)} 2] = 1. We find { δ f c} = 4.2 mHz, in excellent agreement with the value of 3.7 mHz expected from equation (1).

From Nature Vol 430: 15, July 2004
Unrestricted Google Doc for printing

Insist that they each attempt an individual close reading then allocate a timed three minutes for discussion in pairs after asking:

What on earth is going on here?

When the time is up. Solicit some responses to the whole class. After overcoming the initial intimidation factor, it quickly becomes clear that sentences like these are neither jargon nor deliberate obfuscation, but a precise, detailed, objective, highly specialized vernacular in subject areas only fully understandable by “initiated” specialists in the field.

The paragraph was taken from Nature: an encounter with a real science journal, in The Natural Sciences Area of Knowledge section. In the class activity students select an arcane sentence from a real research article.

Holism vs. Reductionism DEFINED By AI BOt

Next, randomly select three student “volunteers” to read the following paragraph generated by Chat GBT. Ask the class: Is it any good?

Holism emphasizes that the properties and behaviors of a system cannot be fully explained by analyzing its individual parts in isolation. It views the system as a whole, where the interactions and relationships between the parts are crucial for understanding it. In this approach, the context, emergent properties and systemic relationships are considered essential.

On the other hand, reductionism suggests that complex systems can be understood by breaking them down into simpler parts and studying them individually. It seeks to explain complex phenomena by reducing them to their basic components and understanding the underlying mechanisms at the lowest level. Reductionism assumes that a complete understanding of the parts will lead to a complete understanding of the whole.

Both approaches have their merits and limitations, and their suitability depends on the context and the nature of the system being studied.

— Holism and Reductionism expertly demarcated by ChatGBT - OpenAI in response to a question by Andrew Brown on May 21, 2023


CLASS ACTIVITY III
—HOLISM AND LEVELS OF ANALYSIS

For this short activity, simply ask student volunteers (who take Biology, Environmental Systems and Society (ESS) and Psychology subjects at HL) to provide insights into these hierarchical and thematic frameworks. If Psychology and/or ESS are not offered at the school invite students to speculate gingerly.

What emerges could lead to some very nuanced whole class discussion that might be revisited later in the Area of Knowledge arena. If time permits finish with the Allegory of the Cave video that begins with a rapid succession of powerful metaphors for Knowledge acquisition.

The following generative questions may not be necessary:

How do the biological, cognitive and sociocultural approaches in Psychology differ from the hierarchy of complexity in Biology?

To what extent is biology a subset of psychology?

Why differentiate between Group 3 and Group 4 IB subjects? Why is ESS in both?

IB Biology and Environmental Systems and Society students will be very familiar with the notion of an interacting hierarchy of complexity as a frame (or map) for understanding living organisms.

IB Psychology students approach their subject from a biological, cognitive and sociocultural levels of analysis.

Image credit: Spheres of Influence—the Biopsychosocial Model in context from Holism versus Reductionism by Joana Stella Kompa.


MORE USEFUL LINKS

Further explorations of holistic and reductionist understanding can be found at Consilience of knowledge, in The Human Sciences, and at Politics divides in the Knowledge and Politics optional theme. The 1940 Louis MacNeice poem, Entirely is located at In praise of the poetic voice in the Knowledge and Language optional theme. Here are the first four lines just as a teaser:

If we could get the hang of it entirely
It would take too long;
All we know is the splash of words in passing
and falling twigs of song…

The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.
— Alfred North Whitehead, (1929) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology,